EyebrarianPrize winnersGet the app

Books › Irreligion

Cover of Irreligion

Irreligion

A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

John Allen Paulos

First published 2007 · 176 pages

A witty, logic-driven dismantling of theological arguments that feels like a brisk, satisfying intellectual workout.

Where to buyBooks like this

What it feels like

Reading this book feels like sitting down for coffee with a brilliant, slightly wry professor who has a knack for making complex logic feel effortlessly clear. The pace is brisk and engaging, moving swiftly through centuries of theological debate with the sharp, clean precision of a mathematician. It cultivates a mood of clear-eyed rationality, stripping away emotional rhetoric to examine the bare bones of belief. The prose is conversational and witty, entirely devoid of dense jargon or intimidating formulas, making the intellectual heavy lifting feel like a stimulating puzzle rather than a chore. It is a deeply satisfying read for skeptics and analytical thinkers who delight in seeing cognitive biases exposed and logical fallacies neatly, cheerfully dismantled.

Mood
  • intellectual
  • clear-eyed
  • stimulating
  • rational
Tone
  • wry
  • analytical
  • irreverent
  • conversational
  • sharp
Pace
brisk
Themes
rationality vs. faith · logical fallacies · cognitive biases · intellectual skepticism · secular clarity
The writing
Crisp, witty, and highly accessible, translating abstract logical concepts into conversational, everyday language.
The arc
Moves from a stance of curious skepticism to a satisfying, grounded sense of intellectual clarity.
Who it's for
Skeptics, science enthusiasts, and analytical thinkers who enjoy seeing philosophical arguments dismantled with sharp, accessible logic.
Content notes
  • critiques of religion

About the book

Are there any logical reasons to believe in God? Mathematician Paulos thinks not. Here he presents the case for his own worldview, organizing his book into twelve chapters that refute the twelve arguments most often put forward for believing in God's existence. Interspersed among his twelve counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions and prudential wagers. Special attention is paid to topics, arguments, and questions that spring from his incredulity "not only about religion but also about others' credulity." Despite the strong influence of his day job, Paulos says, there isn't a single mathematical formula in the book.--From publisher description.

Description from Open Library.

Books like Irreligion

See why they match